Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Project Phase 2B (Azusa to Montclair)
16 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2010121069
Lead Agency
Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority
Document Title
Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Project Phase 2B (Azusa to Montclair)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/14/2021
Present Land Use
various; adjacent to BNSF or Metrolink tracks
Document Description
The Final SEIR evaluated the modifications to the Project to construct surface parking lots (instead of enclosed parking structures, as previously approved) at the Glendora, San Dimas, La Verne, and Pomona Stations. Constructing surface lots would reduce the number of available parking spaces. Two Claremont options will be considered wherein reduced parking is accommodated either fully in a parking structure or via parking surface lot combined with leasing of additional parking spaces from available locations within 1/4 mile of the Claremont Station. Multiple scenarios that include interim and full build terminus station conditions will be evaluated.
Contact Information
Name
Lisa Levy Buch
Agency Name
Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Azusa, Claremont, Glendora, La Verne, Montclair, Pomona, San Dimas
Counties
Los Angeles, San Bernardino
Cross Streets
varies
Zip
various
Parcel #
various
State Highways
I-210, SR 57, US 66, I-10
Railways
Metrolink, BNSF
Airports
Brackett Field Airport
Schools
Glendora High, Fred Ekstrand Elementary
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes (Supplemental Environmental Impact Report)
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes