2010 Fisheries Restoration Grant Program - Water Right License 9853 and Permit 21401
23 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2010012057
Lead Agency
California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Region 1E
(CDFW)
Document Title
2010 Fisheries Restoration Grant Program - Water Right License 9853 and Permit 21401
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/13/2019
Document Description
License 9853 (Application A022574) allows direct diversion of 3,900 gallons per day from the Mattole River. The approved petition changes the purpose of use, place of use, and dedicates the entire face value (1.0 AF) of the license to in stream flow. Permit 21401 (A032305) is issued for the diversion of up to 3.5 acre-feet per year for the same project covered by the license. This project is part of the Mattole River Tank and Forbearance Program, a comprehensive strategy to improve salmonid habitat by storing water diverted in wet winter months for summer use.
Contact Information
Name
Mark Matranga
Agency Name
State Water Resources Control BD Division of Water Rights
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Robert McKee
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Counties
Humboldt
Cross Streets
Whitethorn Construction, 545 Shelter Cove Rd, Whitethorn, Humboldt County
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
State Water Resources Control Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes