MS Prime Six - Development C
16 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2009071069
Lead Agency
March Joint Powers Authority
Document Title
MS Prime Six - Development C
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/12/2019
Document Description
The project is to be located on Unit 4, Lots 9 and 12 of Tract Map 30857-4 in the Meridian North Campus Specific Plan (SP-5). The following summarizes the approved Amendment #5 to the Meridian North Campus Specific Plan (SP-5):
Specific Plan Amendment (SPA 19-01, Amendment 5): The approval of amendment #5 to the Meridian North Campus Specific Plan SP-5 revises the Specific Plan to 1) allow for the zone change of approximately 10.10 acres from SP-5 OF to SP-5 MU, and 2) authorize modifications to three figures in the Specific Plan; Figure II-3A was revised to identify the changes to the General Plan land uses as part of the Project, Figure II-4A was revised to identify the zoning changes as part of the Project, and Figure V-4 was revised to identify the zoning changes as part of the Project.
Contact Information
Name
Lauren Sotelo
Agency Name
March Joint Powers Authority
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
MS Prime Six, LLC. c/o Silagi Development
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Counties
Riverside
Regions
Unincorporated
Cross Streets
March Joint Powers Authority - Unincorporated Riverside County
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
March Joint Powers Authority
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes (Addendum)
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes