Serpentine Prairie Restoration Plan, Redwood Regional Park
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2009052006
Lead Agency
East Bay Regional Parks District
Document Title
Serpentine Prairie Restoration Plan, Redwood Regional Park
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/13/2009
Present Land Use
Regional Park
Document Description
The EBRPD has prepared the Serpentine Prairie Restoration Plan and Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for Redwood Regional Park to restore the vitality and botanical diversity of the Redwood Regional Park Serpentine Prairie. Activities involved in implementing the proposed project include: tree and duff removal; installation of protective fencing; spring mowing and thatch treatment (raking); soil pile removal; soil decompaction and revegetation; and decommissioning, realigning and repairing existing recreation trails within the restoration area. Future phases may include: prescribed burning and short-term grazing.
Contact Information
Name
Julie Bondurant
Agency Name
East Bay Regional Parks District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Oakland
Counties
Alameda
Cross Streets
Skyline Blvd and Joaquin Miller Rd
Total Acres
45
Parcel #
085-001-006-001, 085-001-014, 037A-3150-061-001
Schools
Skyline HS, Oakland Hebrew Day School
Township
1S
Range
3W
Section
34
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
East Bay Regional Park District Board of Directors
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.