Fresno River Trail Under-Crossing at Gateway Drive and Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR)
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2009041052
Lead Agency
City of Madera
Document Title
Fresno River Trail Under-Crossing at Gateway Drive and Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/12/2019
Document Description
Approval of Permit No. 19299, under California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 6, for work within an adopted plan of flood control, within a Regulated Stream (Table 8.1; Title 23, Div. 1, Article 8):
To construct a concrete surfaced bike trail approximately 820-feet long and 8-feet wide; retaining walls, support walls, and safety handrails; two 12-foot wide barrier gates; a removable canopy under the UPRR Bridge; a flood light; replacement of a water well outfall structure; an 8-foot tall chain-link fence along North Gateway Drive; a 4-foot tall chain link fence at the bike trail entrances; and 11 .6 tons of rip-rap placed along the bike trial for erosion protection.
Contact Information
Name
James Herota
Agency Name
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
City of Madera
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Madera
Counties
Madera
Other Location Info
At the Fresno River crossing of North Gateway Drive and UPRR bridge, Madera
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes