CA Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2011-044-04 Minor Amendment No. 5
32 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2009021009
Lead Agency
San Luis Obispo County
Document Title
CA Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2011-044-04 Minor Amendment No. 5
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/6/2014
Present Land Use
Agriculture
Document Description
The Project includes the development of an aggregate mine with a total Project area of 23.2 acres. Of this area 9.7 acres are already heavily disturbed by past excavation activities. The ITP, as originally authorized, allows takes of the California Endangered Species Act designated State Threatened San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica) and San Joaquin antelope squirrel (Ammospermophilus nelsoni) and the State Endangered giant kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ingens). Minor Amendment No. 1 reduced the estimated land acquisition cost HM Lands and the required performance security. Minor Amendment No. 2 revised the Limits of Work when construction activities would occur. Minor Amendment No. 3 extends the deadline for the permanent protection of the Project Habitat Management Lands from December 11, 2013 to December 11, 2014. CDFW issued the ITP and ITP Amendments 1,2, and 3 (collectively, the ITP, as amended) as a responsible agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), relying on an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared and certified for the Project by the lead agency, County of San Luis Obispo.
Contact Information
Name
Julie Vance
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
San Luis Obispo
Counties
San Luis Obispo
Cross Streets
Hwy. 58 & Soda Lake Road
Total Acres
6.8 sq. miles
State Highways
Hwy 58
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.