Flood Control District Mutli-Objective Flood Management Program in the Vicinity of the South-Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project in Alameda County
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2009012026
Lead Agency
Alameda County
Document Title
Flood Control District Mutli-Objective Flood Management Program in the Vicinity of the South-Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project in Alameda County
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/3/2009
Document Description
The proposed project would involve the removal of ~44,000 cubic yards of sediment from Old Alameda Creek at 2 locations between I-880 freeway and the 20 tide-gates structure ~3/4 mile southwest of Hesperian Avenue flood management. The purposes of the project are to increase flood protection of adjacent communities to meet FEMA flood protection standards and to function as a component to make th eSouth Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project plans for shorline habitat restoration feasible, reduce the amount of excessive sediment deposition by designing the levee system to take advantage of the effects of tidal scour and encouraging San Francisco Bay Trail use of the levees.
Contact Information
Name
Paul Modrell
Agency Name
Alameda County
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Alameda
Cross Streets
Hesperian Blvd.
Zip
94545
State Highways
92 and I-880
Railways
Union Pacific Railroad
Waterways
San Francisco Bay
Other Location Info
Hayward
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Alameda County
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.