Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-17
7 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008121133
Lead Agency
City of Visalia
Document Title
Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-17
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/14/2015
Present Land Use
Land Use - Vacant. Zoning - "Planned Shopping/Office Commercial (P-C-SO)." General Plan - "Planned Shopping/Office Comm.
Document Description
Final EIR as revised by and including the Second Partial Recirculated FEIR containing the revised analysis of the project's potentially significant cumulative Toxic Air Contaminant impacts, prepared in response to the Decision and Order of the Tulare County Superior Court in the lawsuit Visalia Smart Growth Coalition v. City of Visalia, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5, for the Visalia Walmart Expansion Project.
Contact Information
Name
Paul Scheibel
Agency Name
City of Visalia Community Development Department
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Visalia
Counties
Tulare
Cross Streets
East Noble Avenue, Ben Maddox Way
Zip
93292
Total Acres
18.35
Parcel #
100-050-001, -007, -013, -014, -038
State Highways
SR-198, SR-63
Railways
San Joaquin Valley RR
Airports
No
Schools
Pinkham, Mineral King
Waterways
Mill Creek, St. John's River
Township
18S
Range
25E
Section
33
Base
MDB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City Council
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.