Sacramento County HCP - Deer Creek Mitigation Site
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007112110
Lead Agency
Sacramento County
Document Title
Sacramento County HCP - Deer Creek Mitigation Site
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/29/2020
Document Description
The project is located at the 301-acre Deer Creek Mitigation Preserve previously proposed as a mitigation bank, but it is now being proposed as an in-lieu fee mitigation site for the South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan (SSHCP). The project will involve the restoration of a creek system and associated habitat features. The restoration actions will result in the re-establishment of a stable channel,
increase channel sinuosity, increase channel/flood plain interaction, and enhance water quality. The project will also re-establish a vernal pool complex with interconnecting swales in an area that previously supported a vernal pool landscape and re-establish appropriately sited vernal pools in areas with few
existing features. In total, the project would re-establish 9 acres of vernal pools, restore 1.56 acres of seasonal wetland swales, and re-establish 1.44 acres of ephemeral stream within the project area
Contact Information
Name
Dylan Wood
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Joe Sanderson
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Sacramento
Regions
Northern California
Township
8N
Range
7E
Section
25, 26
Other Location Info
13333 Kiefer Boulevard
Other Information
The project is located at an unnamed tributary to Deer Creek in the unincorporated
community of Sloughhouse
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No