Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project (TRtP) Segment 7, and 8, Southern California Edison Company, Notification No. 1600-2010-0026-R5 Major Amendment 2
17 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007081156
Lead Agency
California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC)
Document Title
Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project (TRtP) Segment 7, and 8, Southern California Edison Company, Notification No. 1600-2010-0026-R5 Major Amendment 2
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/31/2012
Document Description
The Project includes tow (2) primary elements, the Antelope-Vincent 500-kV Transmission Line (Segment 2) and the Antelope-Tehachapi 500-kV and 220-kV Transmission Line (Segment 3). Segment 2 includes construction of a 21.0-mile 500-kV transmission line and 0.66-mile 220-kV transmission line between SCE's existing Antelope and Vincent Substations. Segment 3 includes construction of two (2) substations, a 25.6-mile 500-kV transmission line from the existing Antelope Substation to a proposed substation located on Oak Creek Road west on the Mojave area, and a 9.6-mile 220-kV transmission line from Substation One to a proposed substation located near south of Tehachapi Boulevard in near the monolith area.
Contact Information
Name
Craig Bailey
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Ontario, Tehachapi
Counties
Kern, Los Angeles, San Bernardino
State Highways
2, 14, 19, 39, 57, 60, 138
Waterways
San Gabriel River, Rio Hondo, Amargosa Creek
Other Location Info
Crosses 23 cities
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Public Utilities Commission
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.