Agua Mansa Commerce Center, Design Review Application and Tentative Tract Map 18250

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2007071010
Lead Agency
City of Colton
Document Title
Agua Mansa Commerce Center, Design Review Application and Tentative Tract Map 18250
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/8/2009
Document Description
CDFG is executing a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement (SAA # 1600-2008-0105-R6) pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, AMB Property Corporation, represented by Mr. Larry. The Applicant is proposing to construct an 11 building industrial complex, a truck/trailer parking lot, and a detention basin on 94.18 acres. The detention basin will capture sheet flows that will result from onsite construction activities. An ~130 ft long pipeline and outfall structure with riprap will be constructed to convey water from the detention basin to the Santa Ana River. The rip-rap will extend into a riparian area adjacent to the Santa Ana River.

Contact Information

Name
Anna Milloy
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Colton
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
Agua Mansa Road and Riverside Avenue
Total Acres
94
Jobs
910
Parcel #
0260-091-77, 78, and 82
State Highways
I-10
Railways
SPRR
Township
1S
Range
5W
Section
35

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
DFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print