Davis Road Bridge over Pixley Slough Replacement Project
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007052115
Lead Agency
City of Stockton
Document Title
Davis Road Bridge over Pixley Slough Replacement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/1/2009
Document Description
The DFG is executing Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2009-0017-R2, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, City of Stockton, Public Works Dept.
The project proposes to replace the existing two-lane bridge that crossses Pixley slough at Davis Road with a bridge that will accommodate four lanes of traffic. Davis Road will be widened to 64 ft between the curbs. It is anticipated that all the road improvements will be constructed within teh existing right-of-way. The proposed bridge will be 77 ft wide, and will include: One 12 ft median, Two 12 ft and two 14 ft travel lanes, Two 1 ft concrete barriers, and Two 5 1/2 ft sidewalks.
Contact Information
Name
Gary L. Hobgood
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Stockton
Counties
San Joaquin
Cross Streets
Davis Road, Eight Mile Road, Waterbury Drive
Zip
95209
Schools
Elkhorn ES and John Muir ES
Waterways
Pixley Slough
Township
3N
Range
6E
Section
32
Base
MDB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
DFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.