Steve Moser
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007052016
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
Steve Moser
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/20/2007
Present Land Use
Vacant commercial
Z: Business Park in addition to Qualified, Landscape/Design Control, Airport Safety Review and Noise Impact combining zones (MB-Q-L-AP-N).
GP: Commercial Services/Industrial General (CS/IG). McKinleyville Community Plan (MCCP). Density: Minimum parcel size to be adequate for proposed uses under the tests of parking and setback requirement, consistent with planned uses of adjacent lands.
Document Description
A Final Map Subdivision for the creation of 12 commercial lots within the Airport Business Park. The lots will be created from the two remainder parcels from the original subdivision and range in size between 30,310 and 61,230 square feet. The parcels will be served by community water and sewer. NOTE: These parcels were approved as the final phase of the original subdivision; however, that approval has expired.
Contact Information
Name
Trevor Estlow
Agency Name
Humboldt County Community Development Services
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Humboldt
Cross Streets
Boeing Avenue, Airport Road
Zip
95519
Total Acres
11.82
Parcel #
510-191-03
State Highways
101
Airports
Arcata/McKinleyville Airport
Schools
McKinleyville ES, McKinleyville HS
Waterways
Norton Creek, White Creek, Pacific Ocean
Township
7N
Range
1E
Section
30
Base
HM
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: McKinleyville
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Humboldt County Planning Commission
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.