State Route 11 and the Otay Mesa East Port of Entry
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007041119
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 11
Document Title
State Route 11 and the Otay Mesa East Port of Entry
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/7/2008
Present Land Use
County of San Diego: mixed industrial, light industrial and technology business. City of San Diego: industrial.
Document Description
The proposed action represents Phase I of a two-phase process aimed at meeting current and projected demand for the movement of people and goods between the United States and Mexico, reducing wait times and other inefficiencies associated with border crossings. Phase I would identify the preferred locations for the future implementation of SR-11 and the Otay Mesa East POE, both of which would be entirely new facilities. Phase I objectives include adoption of an SR-11 corridor, consideration and approval by the Department of State of a Presidential Permit for the POE, and possible acquisition of right-of-way (R/W) for the two facilities.
Contact Information
Name
John Barna
Agency Name
California Transportation Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
San Diego
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
From SR-905/SR-125 interchange 2.1 to 2.5 miles east to US/Mexico Border
Zip
92154
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
SR-125, SR-905
Airports
Brown Field
Schools
San Ysidro Elementary School District
Waterways
Unnamed blue-line streams
Township
18S
Range
1W
Section
36
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Transportation Commission
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.