Citracado Parkway Extension
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007041061
Lead Agency
City of Escondido
Document Title
Citracado Parkway Extension
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/26/2013
Present Land Use
Residential, Light Industrial, Commercial, Open Space
Document Description
CDFW is intending to execute a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code (#1600-2013-0026-R5) to the project applicant, City of Escondido. The Project will impact a total of 1.40 acres of streambed and riparian habitat, including 0.90 acre of southern willow riparian forest, 0.46 acre of southern willow scrub, and 0.04 acre of unvegetated streambed. Pier and abutment placement for the bridge will permanently impact 0.01 acre of southern willow riparian forest. Permanently shading created by the bridge will impact 0.64 acre of southern willow riparian forest and southern willow scrub. Temporary construction impacts outside of permanently shaded areas will impact 0.75 acre of southern willow riparian forest and southern willow scrub.
Contact Information
Name
Kevin Hupf
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Escondido
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
West Valley Parkway to Andreasen Drive
Zip
92029
Total Acres
29.71
Parcel #
235-040-15,50;235-051-05
State Highways
Hwy 78
Schools
Del Dios MS
Waterways
Escondido Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.