Tisdale Bypass Channel Rehabilitation Project
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007022044
Lead Agency
California Department of Water Resources
(DWR)
Document Title
Tisdale Bypass Channel Rehabilitation Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/5/2007
Present Land Use
Open Space and Agriculture
Z: P - Public, with floodplain overlay and AG - Agriculture
Document Description
DWR proposes to remove up to 1,700,000 cubic yards of accumulated sediment from the Tisdale Bypass to restore its channel's capacity. The sediment excavated from the Bypass will be placed north of the Bypass' north levee in any of four locations, (1) north levee right of way west of Reclamation Road, (2) follow land north of the north levee, (3) farmland north of the north levee, and (4) north levee right of way east of Reclamation Road. Erosion near the Tisdale Weir's right abutment makes it necessary to place rock on the south levee's waterside slope. Wetland mitigation will also be included in the project.
Contact Information
Name
Bonnie Ross
Agency Name
Department of Water Resources
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Colusa, Sutter
Cross Streets
Tisdale Road and Reclamation Road (Tisdale By-Pass Quad map)
Zip
95950
Total Acres
1,014
State Highways
113
Waterways
Sacramento River, Tisdale Bypass
Township
14N
Range
1E, 2E
Section
25-36
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Grimes
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Dept. of Water Resources
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.