Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Former Honey Lake Demolition Range - Dry Lake Area, Sierra Army Depot, Final

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2006072062
Lead Agency
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Document Title
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Former Honey Lake Demolition Range - Dry Lake Area, Sierra Army Depot, Final
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/22/2006
Present Land Use
Open Space
Document Description
DTSC has prepared an Initial Study to consider the approval of the Preliminary Final Former Honey Lake Demolition Range - Dry Lake Area Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/CA). The actions to be taken at the Former Honey Lake Demolition Range - Dry Lake Area are intended to investigate and remediate the surface and subsurface environment of potential hazards posed by Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC) to a level that does not pose a significant health risk for the intended future use of the property. The proposed actions are intended to be the final remedy for this area.

Contact Information

Name
Charlie Ridenour
Agency Name
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Counties
Lassen
Cross Streets
Pole Line Road and Amedee Airfield Access Road
Zip
96113
Total Acres
4,485
Waterways
Honey Lake (Intermittent Lake)
Township
28N
Range
16E
Section
27
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Herlong/Sierra Army Depot

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print