California Pacific Medical Center Seismic Compliance, Hospital Replacement, and Campus Renovation Program

7 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2006062157
Lead Agency
City and County of San Francisco
Document Title
California Pacific Medical Center Seismic Compliance, Hospital Replacement, and Campus Renovation Program
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/12/2013
Present Land Use
Various
Document Description
Pursuant to its Long Range Development Plan (LRDP) and to comply with State seismic safety laws regarding acute care hospitals, CA Pacific Medical Center (CPMC) plans to modernize its facilities through a city-wide system of care on five campuses, including a new campus on Van Ness Avenue and Geary Boulevard known as the Cathedral Hill Campus. CPMC currently operates a four-campus hospital system with four acute care hospitals and emergency departments in San Francisco, one each on the Pacific Campus at Sacramento and Buchanan Streets, CA Campus at Maple and California Streets, Davies Campus at Castro and 14th Streets, and St. Luke's Campus at Cesar Chavez and Valencia Streets.

Contact Information

Name
Devyani Jain
Agency Name
City and County of San Francisco Planning Department
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
San Francisco
Counties
San Francisco
Cross Streets
Various
Zip
various
Parcel #
various
State Highways
Hwy 80, 280, 101
Waterways
San Francisco Bay

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
City and County of San Francisco
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print