Duarte Ranch Subdivision 9027 Design Review (DR 16-16) (fommerly Subd. 9027 - Duarte Ranch)
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2006032127
Lead Agency
City of Oakley
Document Title
Duarte Ranch Subdivision 9027 Design Review (DR 16-16) (fommerly Subd. 9027 - Duarte Ranch)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/10/2016
Present Land Use
3 existing residences with detached garages and various outbuildings.
Z: A-2 (General Agriculture)
GP: Single Family High Density Residential (SH)
Document Description
Design Review approval of floor plans, elevations, colors, and materials of the homes proposed for Units 1 and 2 (100 lots), and other design elements of the Duarte Ranch Subdivision 9027. There are five floor plans, each with three elevations proposed. Units 1 and 2 make up to 100 of the 116 approved lots, as well as the entire 2.1 acre neighborhood park site of the approx. 29 acre Subdivision 9027. The site is zoned P-1 (Planned Unit Development) District.
Contact Information
Name
Ken Strelo
Agency Name
City of Oakley
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Oakley
Counties
Contra Costa
Cross Streets
Sellers Avenue and E. Cypress Road (north of BNSF Railroad)
Total Acres
29.1
Parcel #
034-260-013, 014
State Highways
4
Railways
BNSF
Schools
Gehringer, Delta Vista
Waterways
Contra Costa Canal
Other Location Info
277, 401, & 421 Laurel Road
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Oakley
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.