Tentative Tract Map No. 33461
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2005111045
Lead Agency
Riverside County
Document Title
Tentative Tract Map No. 33461
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/3/2007
Present Land Use
The development of the site as proposed would be consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Medium Density Residential, and proposed zoning of R-1. Site development would represent a substantial increase in site-specific development intensities as compared to the existing vacant site condition. The proposed project's consistency with existing and planned land uses within the surrounding area will be discussed in the forthcoming EIR.
Document Description
The change of zone proposes to amend the existing zoning classification from Heavy Agriculture - 10 acre min. (A-2-10) to One Fmaily Dwellings (R-1) to be consistent with the general plan designation of Community Development: Medium Density Residential.
Contact Information
Name
Christian Hinojosa
Agency Name
Riverside County Planning Department
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Riverside
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
North of Bellegrave Avenue and south of Galena Street
Total Acres
64.7
Parcel #
160-060-041-2
State Highways
I-15
Railways
Union Pacific
Schools
Jurupa Valley HS
Waterways
Santa Ana River, Day Creek
Township
2S
Range
8W
Section
17
Base
SBM
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Jurupa Area
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Riverside County Board of Supervisors
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.