Rancho Cordova Parkway Interchange Project

5 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2005092044
Lead Agency
City of Rancho Cordova
Document Title
Rancho Cordova Parkway Interchange Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/17/2015
Present Land Use
Westborough Planning Area, Folsom Blvd. Planning Area, Public/Quasi-Public
Document Description
The proposed project would construct a new interchange over U.S. 50 between Sunrise Boulevard and Hazel Avenue in the City of Rancho Cordova, Sacramento County, California. The interchange would be a "south-only" connection and would also include construction of a new four-lane arterial street, called Rancho Cordova Parkway. Rancho Cordova Parkway would extend from the new interchange south to a new signalized intersection with White Rock Road. The project is located partially within the city and partially in unincorporated Sacramento County. The project would construct auxiliary lanes along U.S. 50 in the area between Sunrise Boulevard and Hazel Avenue.

Contact Information

Name
Mark Thomas
Agency Name
City of Rancho Cordova
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Rancho Cordova
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
White Rock Road
Zip
95670
Railways
Sac RT & UPRR
Schools
Gold River Discovery
Waterways
Folsom South Canal, Buffalo Creek, Amaerican River

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
City of Rancho Cordova
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print