Victor Valley Water District's Infrastructure Improvements for Compliance with the Arsenic Rule Project
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2005061147
Lead Agency
Victor Valley Water District
Document Title
Victor Valley Water District's Infrastructure Improvements for Compliance with the Arsenic Rule Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/30/2005
Document Description
VVWD owns and operates groundwater wells containing arsenic at concentrations ranging from 2 ppb to 15 ppb. The District has determined that a combination of blending and treatment will be implemented at two separate treatment sites to meet the new arsenic limit at all entry points to the distribution system. Based on previous studies and subsequent cost information, the District has decided to implement coagulation/filtration (C/F) treatment and blending activities at the District's existing El Evado and Balsam plant sites.
This project will result in the construction of new C/F treatment and water blending facilities at the District's existing Balsam and El Evado plant sites. The project will also result in the installation of underground water pipelines within developed public roads to convey water from existing District wells to the El Evado C/F plant and eventually to the District's water supply system.
The purpose of the project is to provide domestic water to customers of VVWD that meets newly adopted water quality standards. Beneficiaries of the project are the customers of VVWD which will receive an adequate supply of water that meets current health standards.
Contact Information
Name
Bob Field
Agency Name
Victor Valley Water District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Victorville
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
Balsam Road, Nisqualli Road, El Evado and Dos Palmas Road
State Highways
I-15
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Victor Valley Water District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.