Ash Street / SR 78 Bicycle Path Crossing (City File No. ER 2005-06)
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2005051110
Lead Agency
City of Escondido
Document Title
Ash Street / SR 78 Bicycle Path Crossing (City File No. ER 2005-06)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/11/2005
Present Land Use
Public - Escondido Flood Control Channel
Document Description
Advance Planning Study for the feasibility and design alternatives of a grade-separated bicycle and pedestrian crossing along the Escondido Creek Flood Control Channel at Ash Street / SR 78. Dokken Engineering prepared the study which recommends the development of a paved, 12-foot-wide, approximately 600-foot-long undercrossing to be constructed within the channel similar to the undercrossing at Auto Park Way. The design consists of a double 6' x 6' reinforced concrete box culvert which would support the path for a length of approximately 126 feet, provide for the uninterrupted flow of storm water within the channel, and also allow the trail to pass beneath the Ash Street Bridge. The approaches on both sides of this section of the path would be cut into the channel's concrete-lined southern bank. An 18-inch waterline would need to be relocated. Construction would be accomplished within the existing right-of-way and the design would allow for the ultimate widening of the Ash Street Bridge in the future.
Contact Information
Name
Jay Paul
Agency Name
City of Escondido
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Escondido
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
Ash Street / SR 78
Zip
92027
State Highways
SR 78
Schools
Escondido HS
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Escondido City Council
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.