West Ming Project: EIR / General Plan Amendment / Zone Change / Specific Plan Adoption #03-1544
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2005051055
Lead Agency
City of Bakersfield
Document Title
West Ming Project: EIR / General Plan Amendment / Zone Change / Specific Plan Adoption #03-1544
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/16/2007
Present Land Use
Current land uses consist of agriculture and oil production.
Z: A-20A (Intensive Agriculture, 20-acre minimum) and A (Exclusive Agricultural District)
GP: FPP (Floodplain Primary District) and A-GH (Exclusive Agriculture - Geologic Hazard Combining District)
Document Description
Castle and Cooke, California (both the applicant and property owner) proposed the adoption of the 2,182 acre West Ming Specific Plan. The West Ming Specific Plan will implement a master planned community, including low to high density residential, commercial, recreational, special use designations (light industrial, mineral, and petroleum, public facilities, open space, parks, public transportation, and office) and school uses. The project consists of an amendment to the Land Use and Circulation Elements of the Metropolitan Bakersfield General Plan and the Kern River Plan Element, adoption of the Specific Plan, concurrent Zone Change and Development Agreement. The project also includes annexation in the City of Bakersfield for the portion of the project site not currently within the City boundaries.
Contact Information
Name
Jennie Eng
Agency Name
City of Bakersfield
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Bakersfield
Counties
Kern
Cross Streets
Buena Vista Road and White Lane
Total Acres
2,182
Railways
San Joaquin Valley RR Buttonwill
Waterways
Kern River, Kern River Canal
Township
30S
Range
26E
Section
10,11,
Other Information
Section: 13, 14, 15
Railways: Buttonwillow Branch
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Bakersfield
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.