Dakota / Armstrong Elementary School Site Acquisition and Development Project
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004121147
Lead Agency
Clovis Unified School District
(CUSD)
Document Title
Dakota / Armstrong Elementary School Site Acquisition and Development Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/24/2005
Present Land Use
Existing Land Use and Zoning: Agricultural
GP: Elementary School
Document Description
The project consists of the acquisition of a 17-acre elementary school site, and the development and operation of an elementary school on the site. The proposed school site is located on the southeast corner of Dakota and Armstrong Avenues in the City of Fresno. The site will have approximately 1,070 feet of frontage on Dakota Avenue and 671 feet of frontage on Armstrong Avenue.
The proposed elementary school would be a full-service facility designed to accommodate 700 grades K-6 students on a traditional schedule. The elementary school would have classrooms, faculty work areas, administrative offices, multi-purpose facilities, athletic/recreation areas, and parking lots. Portions of the school grounds would be lighted for security and recreational purposes and would be available for community use during non-school hours.
Construction of the school is planned to begin in 2009. The school would be completed and open for the 2010-11 school year.
Contact Information
Name
Walt Byrd
Agency Name
Clovis Unified School District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Fresno
Counties
Fresno
Cross Streets
Dakota / Armstrong (SE Corner)
Zip
93727
Total Acres
17.2
Parcel #
310-020-24S
Airports
Fresno-Yosemite
Schools
Miramonte, Reagan Ed Center
Township
13S
Range
21E
Section
22
Base
MDBM
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Clovis Unified School District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.