South Bay Salt Ponds Restoration Project and South San Francisco Bay Shoreline Study
11 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004114003
Lead Agency
Fish & Game #3
Document Title
South Bay Salt Ponds Restoration Project and South San Francisco Bay Shoreline Study
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/4/2009
Present Land Use
Various
Document Description
The EIS/EIR evaluates 3 program-level, long-term restoration alternatives as well as project-level Phase 1 actions. The three long-term restoration scenarios include the following: 1) Alternative A, the No Action Alternative; 2) Alternative B, the Managed Pond Emphasis Alternative (50:50 tidal habitat: managed ponds by area); and 3) Alternative C, the Tidal Emphasis Alternative (90:10 tidal habitat: managed ponds by area). The Santa Clara Valley Water District will implement the Pond A-8 Applied Study, one of the Phase 1 projects identified by the EIR/S.
Contact Information
Name
Michael Martin
Agency Name
County of Santa Clara County Clerk
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Fremont, Hayward, Menlo Park, Milpitas, Mountain View, San Jose, San Jose, Fremont, Sunnyvale, Union City, Menlo Park, ..., Sunnyvale, Union City
Counties
Alameda, San Mateo, Santa Clara
State Highways
237, US 101, US 880
Railways
Amtrak
Airports
Hayward, San Jose Int'l, San Car
Waterways
Mt. Eden Creek, Guadalupe Slough, Alviso Slough, Coyote Creek, Alameda Creek, Ravenswood Slough
Other Information
Airports: San Carlos
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Santa Clara Valley Water District
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.