Eagle Meadows General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Tentative Tract 6352
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004101035
Lead Agency
City of Bakersfield
Document Title
Eagle Meadows General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Tentative Tract 6352
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/18/2005
Present Land Use
Low Density Residential (122 acres), Open Space (34 acres)
Z: One Family Dwelling Zone (122 acres) and Open Space (34 acres)
Document Description
General Plan Amendment #03-1188 is a request to amend the Land Use Element of the Metropolitan General Plan from OS (Open Space) to LR (Low Density Residential) on 2.7 acres. General Plan Amendment #03-1188 is a request to amend the Circulation Element to extend the collector street designation on Highland Knolls, east of Vineland Road, and amend the Bikeway Master Plan Map to require Class II bike lane on said same section of Highland Knolls.
Tentative Tract Map 6352 consists of 483 lots for purposes of single family residential development and 6 lots for open space and a drainage basin on 156.27 acres, zoned R-1 (One Family Dwelling) and OS (Open Space), including a request for reverse corner lots and waiver of mineral signatures pursuant to BMC 16.20.060 A.2.
Contact Information
Name
Jennie Eng
Agency Name
City of Bakersfield
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Bakersfield
Counties
Kern
Cross Streets
SR 178 / SR 184
Total Acres
156
State Highways
SR 184, SR 178
Railways
UP & BNSF
Airports
N/A
Waterways
N/A
Township
29S
Range
29E
Section
20
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Bakersfield
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.