Sierra Army Depot - Three Sites Proposed Plan for Record of Decision/Remedial Action Plan
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004062107
Lead Agency
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Document Title
Sierra Army Depot - Three Sites Proposed Plan for Record of Decision/Remedial Action Plan
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/21/2005
Present Land Use
Military Facility
Document Description
Proposed Plan for Record of Decision/Remedial Action Plan for the remediation of contaminated soil at three sites within Sierra Army Depot. Activities include removal of ordinance related materials, excavation and consolidation of metals contaminated soil into two separate Corrective Action Management Units to be located at the Old Popping Furnace Area and the Upper Burning Grounds. Pesticide contaminated soil from the Equipment Yard will be excavated and disposed of at an approved waste disposal facility. Only items that contain explosive residues and are too dangerous to be moved will be treated on site by destroying the item in place. Fences, signs, and Land Use Controls will also be incorporated into the final remedy for all three sites.
Contact Information
Name
John Harris
Agency Name
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Lassen
Zip
96113
Railways
UPRR
Airports
Amedee Airfield (military)
Other Location Info
City: Herlong
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.