Merced's Logistical Support/Services Facility (LSSF)
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004051017
Lead Agency
University of California, Merced
Document Title
Merced's Logistical Support/Services Facility (LSSF)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/21/2006
Present Land Use
Campus Support
Document Description
The Logistical Support Services Facilities (LSSF) project was approved in June 2004, to accommodate the program in one building (30,294 gsf). The campus was unable to construct the building for the budgeted amount, and now proposes a different solution to accommodate the program needs. The revised project consists of three metal buildings designed to contain 17,200 asf (21,500 gsf). LSSF "A" would accommodate the majority of the original program elements, including space for Facilities Management and EHS. LSSF "B" would provide additional warehouse and multipurpose space. LSSF "C" would be a separate self-contained EHS materials unit to accommodate hazardous materials. Remaining program elements would be accommodated in existing UC Merced facilities. A converted laboratory in the existing Science and Engineering Building (900 asf) on campus already functions as an EHS materials handling area. The Castle Aviation Center Building 1200 in Atwater, CA provides about 17,100 asf of additional warehouse and additional multi-purpose space within the facility. This combined strategy nets a total of 35,200 asf, which is comparable to the original space plan and program of 34,600 asf.
Contact Information
Name
John E. Zimmermann
Agency Name
University of California Planning Design & Construction
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Merced
Counties
Merced
Cross Streets
Bellevue Road
State Highways
Highway 99
Other Location Info
Nearest City: Atwater
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
University of California
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.