Little Lake Rehabilitation Project, US Hwy 395
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004021078
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 6
Document Title
Little Lake Rehabilitation Project, US Hwy 395
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/22/2005
Present Land Use
State Highway, Nearly all land adjacent to U.S. Highway 395 is classified as open-space and is owned by the Bureau of Land Management.
Document Description
Caltrans and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) propose to rehabilitate and bring to current standards U.S. Highway 395 near Little Lake from the Kern County line to approximately 13.8 km north in Inyo County. The work would include realigning a curve from km posts 7.9 to 8.2, widening shoulders to current standards, placing a 90 mm asphalt concrete overlay, adding shoulder backing, and modifying the existing drainage system (culvert) to accommodate the curve correction. In addition, Caltrans would reconstruct the metal beam guardrail along northbound km posts 9.7 to 9.8 and extend the existing metal beam guardrail at Five-Mile Canyon Bridge, from northbound km posts 8.14 to 8.2 and southbound km posts 8.76 to 8.79.
Contact Information
Name
Adrienne Disbrow
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Inyo
State Highways
U.S. Hwy. 395
Other Location Info
City: Ridgecrest/Lone Pine
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.