Haas North Addition and Girton Hall Move
34 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2003082131
Lead Agency
University of California, Berkeley
Document Title
Haas North Addition and Girton Hall Move
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/17/2013
Present Land Use
Current use: Surface parking lot. City of Berkeley land use designation and zoning: residential Mixed Use (R-SMU) subarea.
Document Description
The project would move Girton Hall from its current location to a new site in the Botanical Garden in Strawberry Canyon, and construct a new North Addition to the Haas School complex on the current Girton Hall site. The new building would provide a new, six-story (75,500 gsf, 44,000 asf) structure to expand the Haas complex to the north, and address the School's must critical space needs-instructional space, group study spaces, event space, and cafe/communal space. The project would also re-use and refurbish the existing Girton Hall building for program space serving the Botanical Gardens.
Contact Information
Name
Emily Marthinsen
Agency Name
University of California
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Berkeley
Counties
Alameda
Cross Streets
Bancroft Way, just east of its intersection with Fulton Street
Zip
94720
Total Acres
1
Parcel #
55-1886-25-1
State Highways
SR 24, 123, 13, I-880
Railways
UPRR
Airports
No
Schools
Multiple
Waterways
San Francisco Bay, Strawberry Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
University of California
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.