Tentative Tract 14749/Traigh Pacific

8 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2003081085
Lead Agency
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Document Title
Tentative Tract 14749/Traigh Pacific
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/23/2004
Present Land Use
Vacant Land/Etiwanda North Specific Plan Very-Low Residential (<2dwelling units per acre)/Very-Low Residential
Document Description
A proposed Annexation of approximately 240 acres of land into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, with a General Plan Amendment and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment to change the land use designation for approximately 168.77 acres from Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) to Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Conservation to Low Residential and Flood Control/Resource Conservation, respectively and to make master planned circulation modifications to the north and a Development Agreement to address specific conditions of development and annexation Related Files.

Contact Information

Name
Debra Meier
Agency Name
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Rancho Cucamonga
Counties
San Bernardino
Cross Streets
Wilson Avenue and Etiwanda
Zip
91739
Total Acres
168.8
Parcel #
225-083-5,6,7,10,22,23,25,26,
State Highways
210, I-15
Railways
Southern Pacific
Schools
Summit Avenue
Waterways
East Etiwanda Creek
Township
1N
Range
6W
Section
21
Base
SBBM

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print