Mills Peninsula Hospital Replacement
7 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2003072005
Lead Agency
City of Burlingame
Document Title
Mills Peninsula Hospital Replacement
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/27/2005
Present Land Use
Commercial - Office Use; Institution - Other
Document Description
Replacement of the existing Peninsula Medical Center Hospital and related medical office buildings with a new hospital, medical office building, and parking garage. The project is proposed in part to comply with the seismic upgrade requirements of the Alfred E. Alquist Hospital Facilities Seismic Safety Act of 1994 (SB 1953). The existing hospital will be demolished after the replacement project is built. The replacement project will consist of an approximately 440,000 SF, six to seven story hospital building, attached to an approximately 150,000 SF, five story medical office building, and a separate parking garage with approximately 809 spaces, as well as approximately 681 surface parking spaces. The project additionally includes a helipad and various street and pedestrian improvements.
Contact Information
Name
Maureen A. Mignacco-Dutil
Agency Name
Peninsula Health Care District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Burlingame
Counties
San Mateo
Cross Streets
El Camino Real / Trousdale Drive
Zip
94010
Total Acres
26
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
82, 101, 280
Railways
Caltrain, BART
Airports
SFO
Schools
Various
Waterways
Mills Creek, Easton Creek, El Portal Creek
Township
5S
Range
3W
Section
13
Base
MD
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Peninsula Health Care District
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.