Implementation of the Robert A. Skinner Filtration Plant Expansion No. 4 and Oxidation Retrofit Program
8 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2002121111
Lead Agency
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Document Title
Implementation of the Robert A. Skinner Filtration Plant Expansion No. 4 and Oxidation Retrofit Program
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/14/2003
Present Land Use
W-1 (Water Course, Watershed and Conservation Area) GP: Rural/Outlying
Document Description
In order to ensure reliable operations at the Robert A. Skinner Plan (Skinner Plant), the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (Metropolitan) proposes to expand and upgrade the existing treatment systems at the plant through Expansion No. 4 and the Oxidation Retrofit Program (ORP). These projects will 1) expand and modify the Skinner Plan to ensure it is capable of meeting the forecasted water demand for southwestern Riverside and San Diego counties through the year 2025, and 2) achieve and/or maintain compliance with recent or anticipated changes in federal or State drinking water quality regulations at the Skinner Plant.
Contact Information
Name
Jeff Ford
Agency Name
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Hemet, Temecula
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
Borel Road and Auld Road
Zip
92596
Total Acres
411
Parcel #
958040024,958110001
State Highways
79
Airports
French Valley
Schools
Alamos School
Waterways
Tucalota Creek
Township
7S
Range
2W
Section
3&10
Base
SB
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Metropolitan Water District of Southern CA Board of Directors
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.