San Benito Route 156 Improvement Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0151-R4)
12 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2002091009
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 5
(DOT)
Document Title
San Benito Route 156 Improvement Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0151-R4)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/12/2021
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed Amendment No. 1, a major amendment to Streambed Alteration Agreement (SAA) number 1600-2019-0151-R4, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the Project Applicant, California Department of Transportation.
The Project involves: 1) construction of a new State Route 156 bridge over San Juan Creek, 2) widening of a segment of the East Ditch, 3) construction of a new Mission Vineyard Road bridge over East Ditch, and 4) installation of a new underground gas pipeline and abandonment of the old gas pipeline across East Ditch, all in association with the larger State Route 156 widening Project occurring between (and beyond) the cities of Hollister and San Juan Bautista. The Amendment revises the Project Description to include utility relocation work within the original Project footprint.
Contact Information
Name
Steve Hulbert
Agency Name
CDFW
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
San Juan Bautista
Counties
San Benito
Other Location Info
The Project includes work areas within both San Juan Creek and East Ditch in the city (and just outside) of San Juan Bautista, San Benito County along State Route 156 between post mile 3.56 and post mile 3.87. The Project Area is within Section 34 of Township 12 South, Range 4 East, Mount Diablo Baseline and Meridian.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No