Interstate 5/Cosumnes River Boulevard Interchange
9 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2002022072
Lead Agency
City of Sacramento
Document Title
Interstate 5/Cosumnes River Boulevard Interchange
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/18/2008
Present Land Use
Agriculture, Open Space
Z: R-1, R-1A, R-2A, MRD, A, PUD
GP: Regional Commercial and Offices, Commercial/Neighborhood Commercial and Office, Industrial-Employee Intensive, Mixed Use, Low Density Residential, Parks-Recreation, Open Space, Public-Quasi Public Miscellaneous, Agriculture
Document Description
The CDFG is executing a Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2008-0134-R2, pursuant to Sec. 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, Cit. of Sacramento, Dept. of Transportation. The Cit. of Sacramento proposes to construct a 3.2 mi. connector road to extend Cosumnes River Blvd. from Franklin Blvd. to Freeport Blvd. in southwest Sacramento, Ca. The new road would include an elevated crossing and interchange at I-5 and an elevated crossing over Morrison Creek and the Union Pacific Rail Road. The proposed bridge over Morrison Creek would affect wetlands, trees and giant garter snake habitat in the designated floodway.
Contact Information
Name
Gary Hobgood
Agency Name
Deparment of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Interstate 5, Freeport Boulevard, Franklin Boulevard, Meadowview, Pocket Road, 24th Street
Zip
95818
Parcel #
various
State Highways
SR-99, SR-160
Railways
UPRR
Airports
Executive
Schools
Cosumnes River College
Waterways
Morrison Creek, Unionhouse Creek
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Freeport
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.