Interstate 5/Cosumnes River Boulevard Interchange
9 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2002022072
Lead Agency
City of Sacramento
Document Title
Interstate 5/Cosumnes River Boulevard Interchange
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/18/2007
Present Land Use
Agriculture, Open Space
Z: R-1, R-1A, R-2A, MRD, A, PUD
GP: Regional Commercial and Offices, Commercial/Neighborhood Commercial and Office, Industrial-Employee Intensive, Mixed Use, Low Density Residential, Parks-Recreation, Open Space, Public-Quasi Public Miscellaneous, Agriculture
Document Description
The existing Stonecrest Ave. overcrossing would be demolished. The interchange is designed as partial cloverleaf that includes a 4-lane overcrossing structure over I-5. The Cosumnes Blvd. extension would be 4 lanes from Franklin Blvd. to the proposed 24th St intersection, 6 lanes from the intersection to I-5, continuing west with four lanes to the Freeport Blvd. intersection.
Contact Information
Name
Saed Hasan
Agency Name
City of Sacramento
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Interstate 5, Freeport Boulevard, Franklin Boulevard, Meadowview, Pocket Road, 24th Street
Zip
95818
Parcel #
various
State Highways
SR-99, SR-160
Railways
UPRR
Airports
Executive
Schools
Cosumnes River College
Waterways
Morrison Creek, Unionhouse Creek
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Freeport
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Sacramento, City Council
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.