I-880 / Coleman Avenue Interchange Improvements
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2001122053
Lead Agency
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
Document Title
I-880 / Coleman Avenue Interchange Improvements
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/8/2002
Present Land Use
commercial, light industrial, residential
Document Description
The project consists of reconstructing the existing I-880/Coleman Avenue Interchange in San Jose for the purpose of improving traffic operations and safety. The existing interchange, which is located adjacent to the Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, does not meet current design standards, nor does it adequately accommodate traffic demand. The project will reconstruct the entire interchange, including replacing the existing Coleman Avenue Bridge over I-880 and modifying all of the existing on-ramps and off-ramps. In order to improve traffic operations, the project also includes modification to Coleman Avenue, Airport Boulevard, and Newhall Street in the proximity of the interchange.
Contact Information
Name
Mr. Tom Fitzwater
Agency Name
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
San Jose
Counties
Santa Clara
Cross Streets
Coleman Avenue/Airport Boulevard
State Highways
87
Railways
Union Pacific Railroad
Airports
Norman Y. Mineta San Jose Int'l
Waterways
Guadalupe River
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.