Tom and Janice Use Permit (up-98-13)

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2001112037
Lead Agency
Siskiyou County
Document Title
Tom and Janice Use Permit (up-98-13)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/19/2002
Present Land Use
The project site is within the High Soils Erosion Hazard Area, the Scott Valley Deer Winter Range Area, the High Wildfire Hazard Area, and Prime Agricultural Soils Area. Zoning Ag-1-B-80 (Prime Agricultural, with 80-ac re minimum parcel size) and Ag-2-B-40 (Non-Prime Agricultural, with 40-acre minimum parcel size). The proposed project site is located on gently sloping, relatively flat property, approximately 1,400 feet south of the Scott River. Vegetation at the project site consists mainly of native grasses. Deer, rodents and song birds are common in the area. The parcel is shown as being within the Scott Valley Deer Winter Range and as an area containing Prime Agriculural Soils, according the Siskiyou County General Plan and the Scott Valley Area Plan.
Document Description
The applicants request Use Permit approval to bring into compliance an existing, seasonally operated (May through September) private recreational facility.

Contact Information

Name
Richard D. Barnum
Agency Name
Siskiyou County Planning Department
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Fort Jones
Counties
Siskiyou
Cross Streets
Quartz Valley Road
Zip
96032
Total Acres
1
Parcel #
014-130-410 and 014-130-420
Township
44N
Range
9W
Section
31
Base
MDB&M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Siskiyou County Planning Commission
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print