Pacific Gas and Electric Company Divestiture of Richmond-to-Pittsburg Fuel Oil Pipeline and Hercules Pump Station/San Pablo Bay Pipeline Company
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2001102139
Lead Agency
California Public Utilities Commission
(CPUC)
Document Title
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Divestiture of Richmond-to-Pittsburg Fuel Oil Pipeline and Hercules Pump Station/San Pablo Bay Pipeline Company
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/1/2005
Present Land Use
The Pipeline is located primarily underground in Contra Costa County and primarily follows the San Francisco Bay Shoreline between the cities of Richmond and Pittsburg. The land uses traversed by the Pipeline are primarily characterized as urban; however, portions of the Pipeline cross open space/parklands.
Document Description
PG&E is seeking authority through an 851 application (A0005035) to the CA Public Utilities Commission to sell its Richmond to Pittsburg Fuel Oil Pipeline to a new owner, the San Pablo Bay Pipeline Company (SPBPC). In a separate application (A0012008) to the CPUC, SPBPC is seeking authority under Sections 216 and 228 of the PUC Code to own and operate the pipeline as a common carrier pipeline corporation.
Contact Information
Name
Billie C. Blanchard
Agency Name
Public Utilities Commission Energy Division
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Hercules, Martinez, Pinole, Pittsburg, Richmond, San Pablo
Counties
Contra Costa
State Highways
I-80, I-580, I-680
Railways
UPRR
Waterways
San Francisco Bay and San Pablo Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CA Public Utilities Commission
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.