Smoke Management Program for the Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2001092068
Lead Agency
Great Basin Air Pollution Control District
Document Title
Smoke Management Program for the Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/14/2001
Document Description
This project consists of adoption of a smoke management program to reduce and manage the impacts of the air quality emissions associated with the burning of agricultural and/or silvicultural materials either collected and burned in the field or burned in-site. This project is in response to new California Air Resources Board requirements and is intened to benefit the general public by reducing the number and/or duration of impacts on air quality from air emissions caused by agricultural and prescribed burning and the resulting degradation in air quality that may occur. The smoke management program would be adopted along with revisions to the Grear Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District's regulations for open outdoor fires to comply with agricultural burning requirements in Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations (effective March 14, 2001)
Contact Information
Name
Duane Ono
Agency Name
Great Basin Air Pollution Control District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Alpine, Inyo, Mono
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.