Marin Sonoma Narrows Roadway Widening Project B2 (EA 264081)
15 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2001042115
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 4
Document Title
Marin Sonoma Narrows Roadway Widening Project B2 (EA 264081)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/9/2011
Document Description
The Marin Sonoma Narrows (MSN) HOV Widening Project B2 is one segment of the overall MSN Project that proposes to add High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) facilities to US Highway 101 from State Route 37 in Novato, to north of the Corona Road Overcrossing in Petaluma. The MSN Project B2 (Project) will consist of upgrading the existing US 101 four lane expressway into a full access freeway, replacing the existing South Petaluma Boulevard interchange with a new interchange, and construction of frontage roads on both sides of US 101 for maintaining access to intersecting roadways and adjacent parcels. The project will accommodate future construction of HOV lanes in both directions and future reconstruction of US 101 to meet the 70 mph corridor design speed. The Project will extend two existing box culverts that channel two unnamed streams under the highway.
Contact Information
Name
Adam McKannay
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Game, Bay Delta Region
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Address
Phone
Location
Cities
Novato, Petaluma
Counties
Marin, Sonoma
Cross Streets
US 101 / Route 37, US 101 / Route 116
State Highways
37, 116
Railways
SMART
Airports
Gnoss Field
Waterways
San Pablo Bay, Petaluma River, various creeks
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
DFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.