U.S. 101 - Marin/Sonoma Narrows HOV Widening Contract B2, EA-2640UI
15 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2001042115
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 4
Document Title
U.S. 101 - Marin/Sonoma Narrows HOV Widening Contract B2, EA-2640UI
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/26/2012
Document Description
The Operator proposes to improve a 16.1 mile segment of US 101, from Route 37 in the City of Novato, northward to the Corona Overcrossing in the City of Petaluma. The improvments involve constructing a high occupancy vehicle lane, widening and realigning portions of the roadway, constructing new interchanges, upgrading drainage systems, and constructing new frontage roads and bikeways. Segment B1 will have a northern project limit at San Anonio road and progress to the south for about 4.1 miles. The California Department of Fish and Game (DFG) is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement Number 1600-2011-0363-R3 pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, Betcy Joseph/California Department of Transportation.
Contact Information
Name
Timothy S. Dodson
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Game, Bay Delta Region
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Novato, Petaluma
Counties
Marin, Sonoma
Cross Streets
US 101 / Route 37, US 101 / Route 116
State Highways
37, 116
Railways
SMART
Airports
Gnoss Field
Waterways
San Pablo Bay, Petaluma River, various creeks
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
DFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.