O'Brien/Rogers TPM
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2000091055
Lead Agency
San Diego County
Document Title
O'Brien/Rogers TPM
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/9/2001
Present Land Use
The proposed project is subject to the Regional Land Use Policy 1. 3 Estate Development Area (EDA) and General Plan designation of (17) Estate Residential use. The General Plan requires a minimum gross parcel size of 2 acres based on average slope. The current zone is RR.5 Rural Residential, which requires a net minimum lot size of 2 acres. The proposed project is subject to the policies of the San Dieguito Community Plan.
Document Description
The project proposes a minor subdivision of 9.92 acres into three parcels. The proposed lot sizes would range from 2.1 acres net to 4.1 acres net. The lots will receive sewer service from the Rancho Santa Fe CSD and water service from the Olivenhain Municipal Water District. Access to the project site is by Via De Las Flores. As part of the project, an HLP must be obtained and 6.6 acres of Coastal sage scrub must be purchased off site.
Contact Information
Name
Shannon Doyle
Agency Name
San Diego County, Department of Planning and Land Use
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
San Diego
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
Aliso Canyon Road
Total Acres
9. 92
Parcel #
264-110-15
Other Location Info
Rancho Santa Fe
Other Information
Eastsideof Via de Las Flores, north of Aliso Canyon Road, Thomas Brothers Coordinates: Page 1148, Grid G/5
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
County of San Diego Director of Planning and Land Use
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.