Sacramento-Placerville Transportation Corridor Master Plan
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1998102095
Lead Agency
El Dorado County
Document Title
Sacramento-Placerville Transportation Corridor Master Plan
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/28/2018
Document Description
The project proposes various uses, including excursion rail, rail cars, pedestrian trails, equestrian trails, utility easements, and filming along the former Southern Pacific Railroad corridor, it further provides for design guidelines and development standards to protect and enhance the utility of the corridor, and to protect the environment. In keeping with the multipurpose transportation goals, the County has included Site 3: El Dorado Trail Extension Project from the master plan. The project will construct approx. 9 miles of new multi-use trails, including tree removal, shrub clearing, drainage culverts, and paving of new trail sections.
Contact Information
Name
Jose Oseguera
Agency Name
CA Transportation Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Diamond Springs, Diamond Springs, Latrobe, Placerville, Shingle Springs, Placerville
Counties
El Dorado
Cross Streets
refer to Draft EIR for location
Total Acres
app. 270
State Highways
50 & 49
Railways
Southern Pacific
Schools
Buckeye Elementary
Waterways
Latrobe,Carson,Dry Weber
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CA Transportation Commission
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.