Downtown Sacramento-Folsom Corridor Project

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
1998032022
Lead Agency
Sacramento Regional Transit District
Document Title
Downtown Sacramento-Folsom Corridor Project
Document Type
FIN - Final Document
Received
Present Land Use
Primarily rail right-of-way although land use varies throughtout project corridor.
Document Description
Sacramento Regional Transit proposes to improve transit services in the US 5/Folsom Blvd. corridor in the City and the County of Sacramento and the City of Folsom, California. Alternatives evaluated icude a No-Build Alternative, a Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Alterative and a light Rail Transit (LRT) Alternative that would extend LRT service from the existing St. Rose of Lima Station in downtown Sacramento to the Amtrak Station; add double-tracking to existing single-track segments within the City of Sacramento; and extend LRT service from the existing Mather Field Station eastward to downtown Folsom. The LRT Alternative has been identified as the preferred alternative under the preferred investment strategy adopted in the U.S. 50 Corridor Major Investment Study. The LRT Alternative will be constructed to a downtown Folsom station and four future planned LRT stations will be constructed as soon as additional funding is identified.

Contact Information

Name
Anthony Palmere
Agency Name
Sacramento Regional Transit District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Folsom, Sacramento
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
US 50/Folsom Boulevard Corridor
State Highways
160, US50, I-80
Railways
RT Rail Transit
Airports
Mather Field
Schools
Cal State University, Sacramento
Waterways
American River

Notice of Completion

Development Types
Transportation:Other (Transit)
Local Actions
Transportation
Project Issues
Aesthetics, Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Cumulative Effects, Economics/Jobs, Fiscal Impacts, Flood Plain/Flooding, Geology/Soils, Hazards & Hazardous Materials, Hydrology/Water Quality, Land Use/Planning, Noise, Population/Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Schools/Universities, Transportation, Vegetation, Wetland/Riparian, Wildlife, Safety/Security ;Energy

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print