Alvarado Water Filtration Plant Expansion and Rehabilitation
12 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1992121051
Lead Agency
City of San Diego
Document Title
Alvarado Water Filtration Plant Expansion and Rehabilitation
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/11/2000
Present Land Use
A-1-10
Document Description
This project involves expansion of the plant to a maximum capacity of 212.5 million gallons per day (mgd); and modernization of the plant to allow implementation of technology to achieve compliance with the 1986 amendments to the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act. The overall improvements for the Alvarado WTP, as reviewed in an Environmental Impact Report dated May 20, 1994 (LDR No. 88-0459) were approved by the City Council in August 1997. The project includes four additional components of the project, which include the replacement of the Earl Thomas Reservoir, the construction of new pipelines to connect the new Earl Thomas Reservoir to the recently constructed 21 million gallon (mg) reservoirs to the west (East and West reservoirs), and the construction of an intake line into the Earl Thomas Reservoir.
Contact Information
Name
Nicole McGinnis
Agency Name
City of San Diego
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
San Diego
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
La Mesa Boulevard
Parcel #
60-104-7800
State Highways
I-8
Waterways
Lake Murray
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of San Diego City Council
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.