ZAP 99-029, ER 99-19-016
33 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1992101099
Lead Agency
San Diego County
Document Title
ZAP 99-029, ER 99-19-016
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/15/2001
Document Description
This is a request for a 12-month extension of Interim Ordinance Number 9226, which established a 45-day interim prohibition on certain uses within the East Otay Mesa Specific Plan Area and an amendment to the land use map, shown in Ordinance No. 9226 as Exhibit A, to reflect the land use pattern in the proposed Specific Plan Amendment. The Interim Ordinance, approved by the Board of Supervisors on June 21, 2000, and extended for 10 months and 15 days on July 26, 2000, restricts incompatible uses in the East Otay Mesa Specific Plan Area until the Specific Plan is comprehensively updated to more fully guide land use, infrastructure and facility financing. The Ordinance identifies and reserves an area for a potential regional technology business park development and segregates impactive heavy industrial uses from other industrial uses. The Ordinance also allows temporary uses, but prohibits the siting of incompatible uses.
Contact Information
Name
Glenn S. Russell
Agency Name
San Diego County, DPLU
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Otay
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
Otay Mesa Road and Harvest Road
Total Acres
245.79
Parcel #
646-080-04,05,08&646-240-30
State Highways
SR-125, 905
Airports
Brown Field
Township
18S
Section
18,24,
Base
SBM
Other Information
section:25
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
County of San Diego Board of Supervisors
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.