Rural Route 180 Project
23 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1991022072
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, Headquarters
Document Title
Rural Route 180 Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/20/2015
Present Land Use
low density residential and agriculture (grazing and orchards)
Document Description
Segment 3 of the Kings Canyon Expressway Project will realign and widen a 4.5-mile segment of State Route 180 near the rural communities of Centerville and Minkler in eastern Fresno County. The project begins at 0.7 miles west of Smith Avenue and ends 0.7 miles east of Frankwood Avenue and will connect with the previously constructed Kings Canyon Expressway Segment 2 west of Smith Avenue. The new alignment will widen the existing two-lane conventional highway to a four-lane divided expressway. The project will require the acquisition of new right-of-way and the abandonment of some existing State Route 180 right-of-way. A new bridge crossing will be constructed over the Kings River. The State Lands Commission action is an amendment of an indefinite period General Lease - Public Agency and Right-of-Way Use for an indefinite period from February 20, 2015, for just the bridge crossing area over the Kings River.
Contact Information
Name
Jennifer Lucchesi
Agency Name
California Transportation Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Fresno
Counties
Fresno
Cross Streets
Oliver and SR 180
Zip
93657
Schools
Centerville ES
Waterways
Kings River
Other Location Info
Centerville
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Transportation Commission
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.