FRE-180 Kings Canyon Expressway 3 (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2013-0194-R4) Major Amendment No. 8
23 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1991022072
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 6
(DOT)
Document Title
FRE-180 Kings Canyon Expressway 3 (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2013-0194-R4) Major Amendment No. 8
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/23/2020
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed Amendment No. 8, a major amendment to the already amended Streambed Alteration Agreement (SAA) number 1600-2013-0194-R4, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the Project Applicant, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The Project involves activities related to roadway realignment and widening work on SR 180 where it crosses over the Centerville-Kingsburg Canal, China Slough, Collins Creek, the Kings River, Cameron Slough, Byrd Slough, the Carmelita Canal, and the Mount Campbell Canal. This Major Amendment No. 8 allows Caltrans an alternative method of satisfying their mitigation obligation under the Agreement and reflects a change in the Project Description as it pertains to existing culverts conveying China Slough (Location #2).
Contact Information
Name
Javier Mendez
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
California Department of Transportation
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Fresno
Counties
Fresno
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes